Tech

The essence of gravity

2012-01-23T02:26:00.001+02:00

This is short one!

Mostly all physicists think that gravity has a magnetic properties and has magnetic potential, but this is totally wrong! Gravity has a weak magnetic potential.

Only two physical potential can make gravity field (gravity is not force – it is field) who are formed from High Voltage in gas and magnetic field! If earth lose ionosphere – we lose gravity!

This is answer of anti-gravity – we need to make a device who have own gravity field (not magnetic field)

The mass of the electric charge twice the mass of the electron?

2011-10-05T03:30:00.000+03:00

Due to the assumption of the existence of the elementary structures of electrostatic and anti-structures to rationalize that the electric charge of an electron - is structurally embedded in it antistructure electrostatic field. You have attempted to determine its own effective mass of the structure of the electrostatic field, and in fact - the electron charge. She was twice that of an electron. The result is regarded as a fundamental paradox ...

Equivalent mass of the electron charge and mass of the electron

In quantum physics, we can assume that the electrostatic field is formed from the elementary structures of electrostatic and anti-structures. This assumption is not unfounded, because the electrostatic field formed two kinds of electric charges.
The electron, however, is not considered to be anti-particle, although according to his official settings, that it is composed of antimatter, antiparticle positron got in on the historical error. Further confirmation of the validity of this view is forced decay of protons, with the release of several positron [1].

If the positions of the assumptions about the existence of electrostatic structures and anti-structures to consider experiments of Millikan (Robert Andrews Millikan), by definition, the electric charge, it is not difficult to conclude that the electron charge is only of electrostatic antistructure structurally embedded in it. Charge of a proton or a positron - the usual electrostatic structure embedded in them. It turns out the electrostatic interaction of the elementary structure with an electron or a proton anti-structure - a locally annihilation process.

Accordingly, the equivalent energy or the equivalent weight of the most basic structure of the electrostatic field is equal to the corresponding parameters of the electric charge! This is a fundamentally new point of view.

To date, the assumption of the existence of elementary electrostatic structures and anti-structures, of course, debatable, but quite clearly from the following makrovzaimodeystvy charged electric bodies that are capable of moving in space under the action of electrostatic forces.

Modern quantum field theory operates with the integral parameters of physical fields and only close to the definition of basic parameters of quanta [2].

However, the conclusion that the main parameters of the elementary electric charge equivalent to the corresponding parameters of the electrostatic unit structure not only provides a method of determining their own energy, but also makes it possible to estimate how many times the equivalent electron energy greater than that of the electrostatic energy of the same structure.
This is a very strong expansion of world, and today the factors casting doubt on the reliability of the initial assumptions that determined above set out the logic - no!

However, to calculate how many times the potential energy of an electron more of the same energy of the elementary quantum of the electrostatic field, it was not easy. The fact that Millikan in his experiments carefully measured the electrical charge of changing the energy of the ionized micro bubbles by controlling the magnitude of the interaction energy for change in the rate of incidence [3]. However, based on a mathematical evaluation actually introduced in physics is not the unit of electric charge in units of energy, and the minimum quantum pulse of electric current in the newly introduced them to units of Coulomb (R).

How else can one call option with a physical dimension as the product of a second on the amp? .. A unit of electrical power amp had already been identified as macroparameter, has nothing to do with the charge and requires to be translated into the energy of the second parameter of stress.

My attempts to translate Pendants by conventional physical units of energy were not successful, additional data are required. According to information from the Internet to such a conclusion was not one I, and other in solving such problems.

However, all systems of physical units developed on Earth and for a quantitative comparison of the effectiveness of the processes occurring in its environment. Given this fact, is designed "Absolute measurement system of physical units - LT" [4], which, according to its many supporters, relies only two basic units - the length and time.

The system of units LT tested by many researchers and allows for translation pendant unit equivalent mass or energy, though, on a third world setting - the gravitational constant, ie constant Cavendish. Recalculation is very simple. Thus, according to the system and the LT with the continued Cavendish, a pendant is equivalent to 1.162 * 10 ^ (-10) kg. mass. A charge of an electron is known to be -1.6 * 10 ^ (-19) Kl, ie, one Kullön 0.625 * 10 ^ (19) electrons. Consequently, the equivalent weight in kilograms of the electron charge - 1.859 * 10 ^ (-29) kg. This is twice the officially recognized the mass of the electron - 0.91 * 10 ^ (-30) kg.

Got an apparent paradox: the engine of an electron is twice as massive as the electron itself! ..

And he is clearly not due to the above assumptions about the existence and structure of anti-structure of the electrostatic field. After all, in fact, a comparison of equivalent mass of an electron and its constituent parts - its charge. Equivalent masses of the structures of the electrostatic field and could not say, but the existence of this paradox has become clear to me when trying to determine exactly their parameters.

From the above calculation shows that the relevant parameters of the charge should be less than that of the electron, at times even by orders of magnitude. What caused the error in the calculations? The first sin to have a system of units LT. However, it is possible to calculate the mass of the Earth, and the calculation results coincide with the results of its determination by other methods.

It turns out that the reasons are more fundamental paradox, and they need to understand. To begin, probably, be a direct calculation of the electric charge in units of energy for specific results of the experiments of Millikan, and even better to repeat the experiments of Millikan on modern equipment.

Article author: Vladimir Kishkintsev

The Essence of generating strong magnetic pulses

2011-08-14T03:08:00.001+03:00

The energy is compressed into a very short pulse. So you have a single pulse obtained in smal period of time and has very powerful, but power consumption is relatively small. This is called power compression. This is how, for example, Marx generator works. Charge the battery of capacitors, and then all of a single key discharged. But those systems, of which I speak, use other principles. I will not explain them in detail because I do not want to be a teacher for the younger generation of terrorists. But I will say that using the new systems that store and compress the power devices can be made quite small.

Thats how are made electromagnetic bomb, the heart of free energy device!

Elements of the zero period of the Periodic Table of Mendeleev...

2011-08-04T05:33:00.000+03:00

Elements of the zero period of the Periodic Table of Mendeleev
On the nature of Newton and the Crown

"... The more I had to think about the nature of the chemical elements, the more I deviated from both the classical notion of primary matter, and the hope to achieve the desired comprehension of the elements of nature study of electrical and optical phenomena, and each time more urgently and more clearly aware that the earlier order or first must get more real than the present one, the notion of "mass" and the «aether»
Dmitry Mendeleyev

In January 1904, "a piece of St. Petersburg» № 5 on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of Mendeleev published his portrait and interview. When asked what he was doing research at the present time, the scientist replied, "They are designed solely to confirm I have exhibited in the past year, theory, or rather the attempt of understanding the world of chemical aether». What is the theory, which we know so little about and which were fixed only all the latest research scientist?

    Article, "Trying to understand the chemical world aether" DI Mendeleev graduated in October 1902 and published in January 1903, № 1-4 "Bulletin of the self and the library" and often talked about it, so in May 1904 wrote letters to famous scientist S. Newcomb, which refers to his work on the world aether, where the question of the nature of the aether. Reports that in the near future is going to write an article "about the complexities of modern ideas about chemical elements and of electrons ...." On the complexity of the chemical elements and electrons - it is clear to the modern reader, but ... the world aether ...?! Today, even schoolchildren know that this idea was discarded by modern science. In addition, the chemical understanding in relation to the world aether! Strange? Yes! So, probably one of the last works of the scientist is rarely commented upon, almost never mentioned, but it is generally difficult to find! In many scientific and educational libraries in multi-volume "Collected Works" DI Mendeeleeva missing items 2, where is "Trying to understand the chemical world aether». Sometimes it seems that somehow embarrassed trying to black out this "curious" work from the legacy of a scientist! Many people seem to think condescendingly, that the great Mendeleyev in his old age, perhaps, exceeded their competence.
    But let's not jump to conclusions! And there age? This "embarrassing" the theory of Mendeleev nursed almost all of his creative life. He was not yet 40 years old when the periodic system, two years after its opening (a reprint of "Fundamentals of Chemistry", which is stored in the archive scientist), his arm around the character of hydrogen is an inscription which can be decoded as follows: "all the easier aether, in millions time ". Apparently, «aether» Mendeleev presented the lightest chemical element! Again: a chemical element aether-element aether-atomic discreteness of the aether-aether. What kind of classic sense of aether are we talking about? This is not the aether, which is discarded as an unnecessary crutch of modern physics.
    Open the dictionaries and encyclopedias.

        aether (Greek - αἰθήρ aithēr^[1]), also spelled æther or ether - hypothetical material medium filling the space). The concept of E. was taken from the ancient philosophers, who regarded him as a kind of "first mother" and identified him with the space. In classical physics, by E. understood, uniform, mechanical, elastic medium which fills the Newtonian absolute space.

    Might find a slightly different definition, but note that everywhere the emphasis will be on the uniformity or continuity. Is this aether at the Mendeleev? This is not a classical aether! aether, which says Mendeleev, consists of the elements, it atomic, it is heterogeneous, it is discontinuous and discrete. It has a structure!
    Learning more dictionaries and encyclopedias.

    This mechanistic concept (classical aether) broke and experimental verification has been abandoned in the theory of relativity. Representation of E. replaced in modern physics the idea of a material having a structure of a field or a vacuum can not be reduced to a mechanical environment.

    Can not you see that the aether, the chemical structure of which is trying to consider D. Mendeleyev is more of a modern vacuum Dirac aether than the classic Greeks! More interesting? More more! Let's go back to the work of Mendeleev, as they say, to the source!
    Interest in this problem appeared in Mendeleev's already in the 70s: it is closely connected with the periodic system ("it, and excited in me"), and subsequent work on the study of gases. It was the discovery of chemically inert gases and the logical place them in the zero group of the periodic system made for a real opportunity to evaluate the academic chemistry world aether. In the discovery of the law scholar tries to explain the nature of the physical side of weight as the main characteristics of the substance. What is the physical basis of gravity, which is closely related to the concept of the world aether as a transmission medium, it looks for the easiest item (much lighter than hydrogen). However, the results of the experiments the 70-ies, is reduced to proving that «aether is the sum of rarefied gases," did not meet the periodic table. At the end of life in search of answers to questions concerning the underlying properties of matter, he again turned to the "world aether», by which tries to penetrate into the nature of the basic concept of science in XIX .- masses, as well as to explain the new discoveries, and above all the radioactivity. The main idea of the scientist is as follows: "Real understanding aether can not be achieved by ignoring it and apart from the chemistry of its elementary substance; elementary substance is now unthinkable without subjecting them to periodic law."
    Describing the world aether, Mendeleev considers his "first, the lightest of all elements of both the density and atomic weight, and secondly, The fastest moving gas, and third, the least able to form with any other atoms or particles certain how a strong connection and, fourthly, an element common and pervasive everywhere. " Atom's weight of this hypothetical element x, by the scientists, can range 6.9 to 5.3 * 10-7 * 10-11 (if the atomic weight of H is 1). Element x (Mendeleev called it "Newton") received a place in the periodic system in a zero-zero period of as super analogue of inert gases. In addition, Mendeleev admitted the existence of another element lighter than hydrogen - an element y, «crown" (line "crown" were recorded during a solar eclipse in 1869 in the spectrum of the corona, the discovery of helium on earth gave grounds to consider the real and the existence of a "crown") . However, Mendeleev repeatedly emphasized the hypothetical nature of x and y, and did not include them in the table of the elements of the 7th and 8th editions of "Foundations of Chemistry".
    Scientific rigor and accountability in the work of Mendeleev's no need to comment! But, as we see, if it requires the search logic, he boldly advanced the most unusual of the hypothesis, based on deep intuition. It should be recalled that in their predictions of new elements to this Mendeleev was right! All the predictions he made on the basis of the periodic law (the existence of 12 unknown elements at the time), and fixes the atomic masses of elements brilliantly confirmed!
    In the early XX century, not only Mendeleev, but many physicists and chemists believed in the existence of «aether». However, after the creation of Albert Einstein's special and general theories of relativity, this belief was to fade. It is believed that by the 1930s the problem of «aether» no longer existed in science, but a question about the elements lighter than hydrogen itself disappeared. But again, it should be recalled that the issue was no longer the classical aether, aether homogeneous, but structured aether (aether Mendeleev) very much alive, only now it's called a structural vacuum or vacuum Dirac! So the only question of terminology! Returning to the elements lighter than hydrogen. They say that they have not found! Or maybe just not looking? Or rather, when found, simply did not know it!
    Any chemist known homologous series, and is well known that the behavior of the first members, especially the first. As you know the former is always special. He always stands out strongly from the total number. Hydrogen and placed in I and in Group VII. So hydrogen does not the first! So how have these different first elements, the elements of the zero period, from all the other common elements? Will they even look at familiar and well known to us, and I want to say "native" chemical elements? Here sneaks strong doubt! It looks like we will get a completely different "world", and it seems that it is a world of elementary particles! We often talk about the fundamental nature of the Periodic Law, but it seems that it truly did not understand! Repeat the Mendeleev: "... the same substance elementary now unthinkable without subjecting them to periodic law" or "the essence of the concepts that cause the periodic law, lies in the overall physicochemical early match, transformability and the equivalence of the forces of nature," yet "seems to be a periodic law - the future is not threatened with destruction, but only the superstructure and the development promises. " Well, it seems, were inspired and it's time to look, what's all the same to the Hydrogen! Go ahead! Next! Or rather, back? Dmitry Ivanovich believes in us!

    "... Then I hope for the future. Understand the same as that found me, and generally it is important to understand the whole nature and infinitely small ... "
    Mendeleyev in the last years of his life

    Follow the same logic, Dmitry Ivanovich, but take into account the present knowledge, which in his time simply did not exist.
    First, we take as a basis for the serial number of the element that corresponds to the nuclear charge, the truth known to all students from Grade 9.
    Then, if the hydrogen is serial number 1, the element in front of him, of course, 0! This element is in the zero period in a group of inert gases. Formal analogue of the noble gases, inert core with a formal charge 0.
    Consider the possible candidates for a place in the periodic table. The choice of a not very large, but most importantly it is! Of the currently known physical objects is a microcosm: a neutron or a neutrino (photon as having no rest mass and derive the unstable particles until the brackets). Who prefer long refrain. Formally, we are satisfied and a neutron and a neutrino! Proceed until the next element to hydrogen, is also an element of the zero period, but already among the first group of analog and hydrogen. But his formal order number -1! And the same nuclear charge! The total charge the same as all the elements must be zero. And in this place in the periodic table is a legitimate candidate! It is well known to physicists and radiochemist Positronium! By the way, he actually looks like a very cool predicted by Mendeleev "crown" and it could be observed in stars like the Sun and others, especially the hotter! So, Positronium (Ps), we recall that a system consisting of an electron and a positron meet the formal requirements of the first element of the zero period. The fact that it is difficult to distinguish where the kernel, and where the shell, let us not confuse, as we expected in fact, that elements of the zero period will be extraordinary! Also, just because of the symmetry of the positronium in the future will reveal a whole new perspective of the periodic system! But let's not get ahead!
    Let us return to the element with atomic number zero. Who is the neutron or neutrino? Who is more in keeping with Newton's Mendeleev?
    Before you make a choice, let's consider one fact which should not be ignored. For ease of review we have proposed as candidates for the zero position of the neutron and neutrino, but this is just the elementary particles, and all other elements are complex systems where there are opposite charges as Coulomb, and others (particles and antiparticles - the electron and positron) . Therefore, obeying the law of conservation of charge, under the neutrinos will mean a pair of neutrinos and antineutrinos, and a pair of neutron-neutron and antineutron! It follows that nothing should be chosen! They both suit us, and moreover they have the isotopic ratio, they differ only by one baryonic charge! They just do the isotopes! Just as, for example, hydrogen and deuterium. But what of those isotopes is still spoken Mendeleev? It's all clear, of course, Newton is the neutrinos! We must remember the properties of Newton's extremely light weight and virtually complete inactivity in conjunction with other substances!

    "Extremely low density gas, ie, extreme rapidity of the proper motion of its particles - with a negligible weight of them should have a say in that this gas will penetrate everywhere, will fill the universe, but to anything not firmly adjoin - for coherent motion in a chemical compound that is he did not connect with anything. "

        All this corresponds to a pair of neutrinos and antineutrinos, neutrinos (00Nn)! And the extraordinary speed of its own motion - near the speed of light, and little weight - about 10-9, which corresponds to the prediction of Mendeleev (10-7 - 10-11), there comes through, with virtually nothing it does not interact (the Earth and the sun even for a transparent ), and fills the entire universe (the mass of neutrinos in the universe is at least 30 times greater than the density of ordinary matter)!
    In general, it is not clear how could our world view of the universe does without the Neutrino Newton! Neutrons (n0Nn) as one of the most common in the universe (the substance of neutron stars and black holes)! To share the same classic chemical elements have only a small fraction of the mass of the universe! All classic chemical relative to the neutrino and neutron is like foam on the shore of the sea to the very seas! Only with elements of the zero period of the periodic system gets its logical conclusion, unless you consider its mirror reflection with respect to zero again, the period in which all the others looked through Antielementy, ie chemical elements Antiworld! Now, it is hoped that Dmitry Ivanovich would be pleased!

Damped Wave

2011-08-04T04:52:00.007+03:00

A device for converting capacitor discharges; Damped wave

Tesla:

A device for converting capacitor discharges; Damped wave

I realized that I was a huge benefit-break wave at its peak. If I used a custom chopper, he would interrupt the current indiscriminately as low, and the high part of the wave. I had two forms of this system: first, where I ran interrupt directly from the shaft dynamo, and the other in which I ran it through isochronous engine. Then, the movement of these contacts (KK), I have sought to exact match the time of contact so that it occurred precisely at the peak of the wave. This is - a form of interruption, which is included now in the hundreds of patents and now widely used.

Tesla:

Yes, but with a different type of circuit, I would certainly have got it. The advantage of this device was a power failure in a short period of time, and therefore could increase power, and with this scheme, I met all those wonderful experiments which reprinted from time to time in the technical articles. I had to clean up

energy of the chain in terms of hundreds or thousands of horsepower. In Colorado, I reached the power 18 million HP and always - this device: energy accumulated in the capacitor and discharged in the shortest period of time. You could not do it

continuous wave. Zadempfirovannaya wave is advantageous because it allows you to 1 kilowatt generator, capacity of 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, or 5,000 kilowatts; because If you have a continuous or undamped wave, 1 kilowatt gives you the opportunity to a wave of 1 kilowatt or more. This is the reason that the scheme

arrester with iskrogasyaschim became popular.

I perfected it so that I was able to pick up energy from the engine spending their driving force (can be translated as rotation). For example, if there is engine to 200 hp, I gather the energy for one minute at 5,000 or 6.000 hp charge of the energy capacitor and discharge it well, but at a level of several million hp These remarkable effects were reproduced exactly. The condenser is the most wonderful Toy, as I noted in their reports because it allows us to get more power than even the explosives. There is no limit of energy that can be obtained from the capacitor, Unlike explosives that have a limit to the energy.

The usual experiment, for example, in my laboratory on Houston Street: pass through coil energy at a rate of several thousand horsepower, put a piece of thick foil on a stick and bring it to the coil. Foil melted, and not only survive but how would evaporate, while still in its form and the whole process took place in such a short interval

time that he was like a cannon shot. As soon as I put it in the coil - the explosion occurred. This experience struck me. This is very simply showed the power of the capacitor, and while I have been so reckless, that in order to demonstrate my visitors that my theories were correct - I stuck my head in the coil, and escaped unhurt, although the Now I do not have repeated it.

We did, of course, but in most cases intrument reception was different. When I worked with a continuous or undamped waves generated in such a way - I usually went to the high frequency range. I also worked with a frequency several thousand, but at the outlet then receive less. In order to receive capacity-the machine must operate at frequencies of short range.

Counsel:

What does it mean for you-frequency short-range?

Tesla:

I mean frequency of 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, or thereabouts.

Counsel:

I understood very little of your application - some time ago, when you have reported the use of several thousand horsepower to charge a capacitor and receiving million hp when it is discharged. I'd be very surprised if you got the same thing on this machine.

Tesla:

Yes, I loaded capacitor 40.000 volts. When it was fully charged, I discharged it immediately, through a short circuit, which gave me a scale of very fast oscillations. Suppose that I charge the capacitor 10 watts. For such a wave the energy flow will be (4 X 104) 2, and this, multiplied by the rate of 100,000. You see, so you can get thousands of or millions of HP

Counsel:

I would like to clarify: it depended on surprise (fast) discharge?

Tesla:

Yes. It is - simply an electrical analog of copra, or hammer. You accumulate the energy from by the distance traveled and then you release it with a huge surprise (Speed). Distance, which overcomes low-mass, so the pressure turns out great.

Counsel:

You thought it was the best condition for the transfer of energy without the use of wires?

Tesla:

No, I have not used this method for the transfer of energy. I used it only for get effects, because of which I was called a magician. If I had used simply undamped waves, I would like some electrician.

Tesla:

This coil, which I subsequently repeatedly pointed out in his patent: 645.576 and 649.621, in the form of a spiral, was, as you see, was previously made into a cone shape. The idea was to place the coil in relation to a primary, so that inductive coupling to get away, but now it is called a free bond, but free - in order to obtain a large Resonant amplification. Like I said, It was the first simple step towards the evolution of the invention, which I call "Amplifying transmitter." This means that the chain - with a huge electromagnetic driving force and low damping factor - is grounded and connected to antenna, and with the defining conditions that can occur in the chain a huge accumulation of electrical energy.

Counsel:

Mr. Tesla, here will explain: what do you call an electromagnetic driving force (Momentum)?

Tesla:

This means that you must have a momentum in the chain. You need to have a large self-induction in order to accomplish two things: first, the relatively low frequency, which will reduce the emission of electromagnetic waves in a relatively small size, and secondly, a large resonance effect. Unable to get

in the antenna, for example, once a large capacity and small self-induction. Most capacitance and inductance small - very poor type of circuit that can be created; it gives the same low resonance effect. That was the reason that in my experiments in Colorado energy was 1,000 times greater than in the present antennas.

Counsel:

You say that energy was 1,000 times greater. You want to say that the tension was raised, or - the current, or - both?

Tesla:

Yes [both]. For greater clarity, I take a very large self-inductance and a relatively small capacity, and link them so that electricity can not penetrate (Radiated). I am so getting a low frequency, but, as you know electromagnetic radiation is proportional to the square root of capacity, divided on self-induction. I do not let the energy go, I accumulate in the chain

great energy. When it received a high voltage, then if I want to get electromagnetic waves, and I'm doing a (radiating), but I prefer to reduce these wave number and pass current to the ground, because the energy of electromagnetic waves not recoverable, whereas the current from the land can be fully recovered (return), we how to load the elastic energy in the system.

Counsel:

What kind of flexible system, you say?

Tesla:

I mean, if you pass a current in the circuit with a large self-induction, and no radiation does not occur, and you have at this low resistance - there is no possibility this energy is radiated into space, therefore, pulses - are cumulative.

Counsel:

Let's see if I understood you correctly. If you have radiation or electromagnetic waves emanating from your system, the energy - has been lost?

Tesla:

permanently lost. In my circuit, where you can get well and electromagnetic waves - 90 percent of electromagnetic waves if you like, and 10 percent in the form of current, which passes through the earth. Or, you can deploy process and receive 10 percent of the energy in electromagnetic waves and 90 percent in energy current that passes through the earth. You see - a device developed of me made a huge difference in potential and currents in antennnoy chain. These requirements must be met and always matter: Are you feeding the energy of the current-current or electromagnetic waves. Do you want to a high voltage and large accumulation of vibrational energy - and to You can also calibrate this vibrational energy. Relevant design and proper choice of wavelengths you can do so to obtain, for example, 5 percent in these electromagnetic waves and 95 percent-in the current that passes through ground. This - what I do. Or you can get, as these radio men, 95 percent the energy of electromagnetic waves and only 5 percent of the energy-supply. . . . Unit suitable for both methods. I was producing radiation in his scheme, I suppress electromagnetic waves. . . . In my system - you should otbrost the idea that radiation is that energy is radiated. The energy is not emitted, and-maintained. . . .

Counsel:

Excuse me for interrupting you again. Recently, you talked about getting all the transmitted You on your energy-receiving station - using this method. I do not understand how a You got it.

Tesla:

Well, I'll explain it.

In my first attempts, I, of course, just thinking about how to effectively initiate ground with such force that the instruments were able to earn. You know very well that before learning to fly, you must first learn to walk. Since I have improved my unit, then clearly that I can return the bulk of the energy that goes on ground in all directions, for the simple reason that the system I developed as soon as the current falls to the ground, he can not leave it because transmission rate was low, hence, electro-magnetic radiation has also been low. Potential, electric potential - behaves like a temperature. We could call-electric potential temperature. The Earth is a huge body. Potential difference on the ground are small, the radiation is very small. Consequently, If I bring her to the ground current, load current energy there as electromagnetic driving force and vibration is not absorbed as long as I am not placed at a distance receiver, it will begin to produce energy and the energy will only go to that point and nowhere more.

Counsel:

And I think that these methods appear in your mind as the methods for obtaining undamped oscillations. It seems that you have said before that you really used these methods in Colorado and received a continuous generation.

Tesla:

Yes

Counsel:

Which method you use there [in Colorado]: a spark? - The arc? - Or that the method you used for the continuous generation?

Tesla:

The method was this: I have been current in the 550 - volt, which I loaded capacitors. These capacitor discharged through a primary in the form of an arc, sometimes I introduced in this arc mechanical chopper, which produced several thousand interrupts per second. And I got absolutely continuous wave packet in such a way as described in my patents.

The reason that I show here the capacitor [Fig. 83] - it is synonymous with undamped waves (ie, concepts: a capacitor and cascading waves are synonyms). If I showed the entire instrument to be the same as posted there, then I could still damped wave, but if I use the alternator or anything else get the energy for this capacitor, then the capacitor is usually worth it. For example, if I use an alternator, I shunt it to the terminals capacitor in order to increase the current in a primary. Then I set up this circuit on alternator, and increases the current in a primary, respectively, the coefficient inductance with respect to resistance. Therefore, this capacitor is here for any of the methods and means simply (and obviously from the description in the patent), which This system-damped waves as high peaks of the building may not be obtained in another way. Whenever I want to get the highest potential, I must comply with these rules in order to make the potential to grow up to this magnitude.