Due to the assumption of the existence of the elementary structures of electrostatic and anti-structures to rationalize that the electric charge of an electron - is structurally embedded in it antistructure electrostatic field. You have attempted to determine its own effective mass of the structure of the electrostatic field, and in fact - the electron charge. She was twice that of an electron. The result is regarded as a fundamental paradox ...

**Equivalent mass of the electron charge and mass of the electron**

In quantum physics, we can assume that the electrostatic field is formed from the elementary structures of electrostatic and anti-structures. This assumption is not unfounded, because the electrostatic field formed two kinds of electric charges.

The electron, however, is not considered to be anti-particle, although according to his official settings, that it is composed of antimatter, antiparticle positron got in on the historical error. Further confirmation of the validity of this view is forced decay of protons, with the release of several positron [1].

If the positions of the assumptions about the existence of electrostatic structures and anti-structures to consider experiments of Millikan (Robert Andrews Millikan), by definition, the electric charge, it is not difficult to conclude that the electron charge is only of electrostatic antistructure structurally embedded in it. Charge of a proton or a positron - the usual electrostatic structure embedded in them. It turns out the electrostatic interaction of the elementary structure with an electron or a proton anti-structure - a locally annihilation process.

Accordingly, the equivalent energy or the equivalent weight of the most basic structure of the electrostatic field is equal to the corresponding parameters of the electric charge! This is a fundamentally new point of view.

To date, the assumption of the existence of elementary electrostatic structures and anti-structures, of course, debatable, but quite clearly from the following makrovzaimodeystvy charged electric bodies that are capable of moving in space under the action of electrostatic forces.

Modern quantum field theory operates with the integral parameters of physical fields and only close to the definition of basic parameters of quanta [2].

However, the conclusion that the main parameters of the elementary electric charge equivalent to the corresponding parameters of the electrostatic unit structure not only provides a method of determining their own energy, but also makes it possible to estimate how many times the equivalent electron energy greater than that of the electrostatic energy of the same structure.

This is a very strong expansion of world, and today the factors casting doubt on the reliability of the initial assumptions that determined above set out the logic - no!

However, to calculate how many times the potential energy of an electron more of the same energy of the elementary quantum of the electrostatic field, it was not easy. The fact that Millikan in his experiments carefully measured the electrical charge of changing the energy of the ionized micro bubbles by controlling the magnitude of the interaction energy for change in the rate of incidence [3]. However, based on a mathematical evaluation actually introduced in physics is not the unit of electric charge in units of energy, and the minimum quantum pulse of electric current in the newly introduced them to units of Coulomb (R).

How else can one call option with a physical dimension as the product of a second on the amp? .. A unit of electrical power amp had already been identified as macroparameter, has nothing to do with the charge and requires to be translated into the energy of the second parameter of stress.

My attempts to translate Pendants by conventional physical units of energy were not successful, additional data are required. According to information from the Internet to such a conclusion was not one I, and other in solving such problems.

However, all systems of physical units developed on Earth and for a quantitative comparison of the effectiveness of the processes occurring in its environment. Given this fact, is designed "Absolute measurement system of physical units - LT" [4], which, according to its many supporters, relies only two basic units - the length and time.

The system of units LT tested by many researchers and allows for translation pendant unit equivalent mass or energy, though, on a third world setting - the gravitational constant, ie constant Cavendish. Recalculation is very simple. Thus, according to the system and the LT with the continued Cavendish, a pendant is equivalent to 1.162 * 10 ^ (-10) kg. mass. A charge of an electron is known to be -1.6 * 10 ^ (-19) Kl, ie, one Kullön 0.625 * 10 ^ (19) electrons. Consequently, the equivalent weight in kilograms of the electron charge - 1.859 * 10 ^ (-29) kg. This is twice the officially recognized the mass of the electron - 0.91 * 10 ^ (-30) kg.

Got an apparent paradox: the engine of an electron is twice as massive as the electron itself! ..

And he is clearly not due to the above assumptions about the existence and structure of anti-structure of the electrostatic field. After all, in fact, a comparison of equivalent mass of an electron and its constituent parts - its charge. Equivalent masses of the structures of the electrostatic field and could not say, but the existence of this paradox has become clear to me when trying to determine exactly their parameters.

From the above calculation shows that the relevant parameters of the charge should be less than that of the electron, at times even by orders of magnitude. What caused the error in the calculations? The first sin to have a system of units LT. However, it is possible to calculate the mass of the Earth, and the calculation results coincide with the results of its determination by other methods.

It turns out that the reasons are more fundamental paradox, and they need to understand. To begin, probably, be a direct calculation of the electric charge in units of energy for specific results of the experiments of Millikan, and even better to repeat the experiments of Millikan on modern equipment.

Article author: Vladimir Kishkintsev

## No comments:

Post a Comment